Tanzania's Performance on the Resource Governance Index
Tanzania received a "weak" score of 50, ranking 27th out of 58 countries. A relatively high score on Safeguards & Quality Controls was offset by poor performance on other components.
(out of 58)
(out of 100)
|46||Institutional & Legal Setting||44|
|17||Safeguards & Quality Controls||68|
Institutional & Legal Setting (Rank: 46th/58, Score: 44/100) learn more
Tanzania's "weak" score is due in part to insufficient reporting requirements and the lack of a freedom of information law.
The Energy and Minerals Ministry and the Tanzania Revenue Authority both collect payments from mining companies. Companies make some direct payments to affected communities; otherwise, all revenues go to the treasury. After years of receiving very little in royalty payments from mining companies, the 2010 Mining Act increased the royalty rates between one and two percent depending on the mineral, although contract negotiations with extractive companies continue to be opaque.
Environmental impact assessments are required, but companies do not always submit them before licenses are granted, and the state mining company is not required to publish revenue reports. However, Tanzania has signed on to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and achieved compliant status in December 2012.
Reporting Practices (Rank: 27th/58, Score: 48/100) learn more
While Tanzania provides some information on mineral production and revenues, the failure to publish mining contracts and a lack of data on the state-owned mining company contributed to a "weak" score.
Little information is available on the mineral licensing process before licenses are granted. Once mining rights are awarded, information is available only in a complex digital format for a fee, and environmental impact assessments are released only upon request.
The Finance Ministry publishes information on production volumes and the value of exports, but does not provide revenue data. The Energy and Minerals Ministry publishes data on reserves, production volumes, prices, export values, operating companies, taxes and royalties, but has yet to disclose figures on license fees, acreage fees, dividends or bonuses. The Bank of Tanzania publishes annual reports on exports and production volumes and values.
Safeguards & Quality Controls (Rank: 17th/58, Score: 68/100) learn more
Tanzania received a "partial" score, its highest on any component, due in part to conflict-of-interest disclosure requirements and satisfactory checks on the budgetary process.
However, new legislation has not eliminated the discretionary powers of the minister of energy and minerals in licensing and contract negotiations. The new mining law does not clearly outline the legislature's oversight responsibilities, and Parliament does not consistently review mining revenues.
The Tanzania Minerals Audit Agency was established in December 2009. While its autonomy is questioned by some members of civil society, its creation is generally regarded as a positive development, and the agency's annual reports have increased public access to information.
Enabling Environment (Rank: 24th/58, Score: 42/100) learn more
Tanzania has a "weak" enabling environment, with particularly low scores in government effectiveness and the rule of law. It scores poorly on corruption and accountability indicators.
State-Owned Companies (Rank: 31st/45, Score: 33/100) learn more
The State Mining Corporation (STAMICO) is entirely government-owned. It has been largely inactive in recent years, but the government hopes to revitalize it in order to manage joint ventures with private companies. So far, STAMICO has only taken part in one joint venture and no information is available on future operations. The company is audited annually, but does not publish reports on its operations or revenues.
Natural Resource Funds and Subnational Transferslearn more
The government has stated its commitment to establishing a mineral development fund, but this has yet to happen. Civil society leaders have advocated for subnational transfers of resource revenues, and mining companies currently pay a one-time fee of $200,000 directly to local councils in areas where they operate.
INSTITUTIONAL & LEGAL SETTING
SAFEGUARDS & QUALITY CONTROLS
To explore all data and compare country scores, use the RGI Data Tool.
Key Economic Indicators
|GDP (constant 2011 international $ billion)||13.0||16.0||23.9|
|GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2005 international $)||868||1,070||1,336|
|Extractive exports (% total exports)||1||12||37|
|Source: World Bank.|