Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Azerbaijan Budget Expenditures Fluctuate with Oil Revenues

26 October 2017
Author
Tommy Morrison
Topics
Revenue managementState-owned enterprises
Countries
Azerbaijan
Stakeholders
Government officials
Social Sharing

Azerbaijan, one of the most resource-rich countries in Eurasia, has faced serious, rapidly changing and contradictory development of its economy for the last 10 years. Starting in 2005, the country became the beneficiary of an oil boom that resulted in some USD 125 billion in oil revenues being transferred to state coffers. That influx of cash was accompanied by two currency devaluations and a decade of economic problems outside of the oil sector. The commodity crash in 2014 saw prices for Azeri oil go from over USD 100/barrel in 2014 to just over USD 50/barrel in 2015. At that point, ordinary people started feeling in their own lives the volatility resulting from an economic dependence on resource revenues.

With the help of local experts, the Natural Resource Governance Institute has collected and presented Azeri budget data to explore and explain how huge oil revenues were used; how dependent the state budget was and is on the extractive sector; and what spending the government prioritized during and after the oil boom. The analysis covers the years from 2005 to 2016 and consists of an interactive visualization showing correlations between oil revenues, government revenues and budget expenses. There are two options available in the visualization; these can be toggled at the top left. The exact values of bar and line segments can be seen by hovering the pointer over the chart.

Click above to see the visualization.

Budget priorities versus extractive revenues

The first visualization shows budget priorities prior to, during and after the oil boom. As seen from 2005 to the oil boom peak in 2013, the government prioritized infrastructure spending, increasing infrastructure spending by over 5,000 percent, compared to a 1,000 percent increase in overall spending in the same time period. Health spending and education spending rose only 375 percent and 400 percent during that time period, respectively. In 2016, post-oil boom, the amount of infrastructure expenses went down to USD 1.7 billion, just 20 percent what it was three years prior. It should also be noted that Azerbaijan faced double devaluation in 2015, and its national currency lost half its value.

Budget dependence on the extractive sector

The second visualization illustrates the dependence of the Azeri budget on extractive sector revenues, as well as the volatility of budgets when depending so heavily on the natural resource sector. The State Oil Fund of Azerbaijan (SOFAZ) is a public sector organization that collects and manages revenues from oil and gas production on behalf of citizens and future generations. As the oil boom went on, SOFAZ transferred an increasing amount of its revenues to the state budget. From 2005 to 2007, SOFAZ transferred 43 percent of its revenues to the state budget; for 2011 to 2013, that grew to 70 percent. And in 2015 and 2016, SOFAZ transferred more money to the state budget than it earned in revenues.

Encouragingly, non-oil state revenues saw solid growth of over 350 percent between 2005 and the oil boom peak in 2013, and stayed consistent through 2014 and 2015 despite the oil crash.

While the lasting effects of Azerbaijan’s revenue policy throughout the oil boom are still being revealed, tools like these can help citizens, media and governments better understand the implications of heavy reliance on natural resource revenue and the importance of proper oversight.

The data used in this blog is available on ResourceData.org here.

Fidan Bagirova was formerly NRGI's Eurasia senior officer. Tommy Morrison is a research and data associate with NRGI.

Related content

Twelve Red Flags: Corruption Risks in the Award of Extractive Sector Licenses and Contracts

6 April 2017
Aaron SayneAlexandra GilliesAndrew Watkins

NRGI’s Top 10 Blog Posts in 2016

13 December 2016

Blended Learning Course in Revenue Management

Event type: 
Training
Sunday, April 15, 2018 - 09:00 to Monday, July 2, 2018 - 17:00
Baku, Azerbaijan

May 2015 Letter from the President

14 May 2015

Transforming Natural Resource Wealth into Sustainable Prosperity: Eurasia Regional Knowledge Hub Training Course

Event type: 
Training
Saturday, May 21, 2016 - 09:00 to Saturday, May 28, 2016 - 17:00
Baku, Azerbaijan
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search