Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Global initiatives
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Legislation and regulation
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Licensing and negotiation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Myanmar
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Nigeria
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Peru
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Advanced
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Contact us
    • Financials
    • Grant-making
    • Privacy policy
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Treasuries in Africa Mining Hubs Under Pressure

1 August 2016
Author
Thomas Lassourd, Alexandra Readhead
Topics
Tax policy and revenue collection
Countries
Ghana, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Zambia
Stakeholders
Civil society actors, Government officials, Parliaments and political parties
Precepts
P4 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

Note: This blog originally appeared as an op-ed in This is Africa on 6 July 2016.
 
When the African Union’s members meet in Kigali, Rwanda, from 10 to 18 July, the dire state of their public finances will likely be a key topic.
 
The bust in mineral and oil prices has left many resource producers with budget shortfalls. The cuts in public spending that are likely to ensue threaten social spending and development plans. With USD 35bn worth of Eurobond debt maturing between 2021 and 2025, African mineral producers have only a few years to right the ship.


 Data visualization by Giorgia Ceccinato for NRGI

As finance ministers weigh options to balance their budgets, they will want to ensure that taxpayers pay their due. But this is easier said than done. Tax administration in many countries is weak, and tax policies suboptimal.
 
This leaves governments vulnerable to maneuvering by multinational companies – in the mining sector in particular – whose complex corporate structures allow them to make the most of the many loopholes and peculiarities of the global tax system.
 
Mining structures
 
Subsidiaries of global mining companies in Africa mostly trade with companies with which they are affiliated. They sell mineral production to marketing centers, finance the development of a mine’s infrastructure, buy machinery or pay for legal and accounting services.
 
If miners did this business with unaffiliated companies, they would negotiate deals for goods and services at market prices. But because most of these transactions are between affiliated companies, deals take place at “transfer prices” set by tax accountants, legal experts and management controllers at the global level to maximize a multinational company’s profits.
 
This can run counter to the host country’s interests when the transacting affiliates undervalue sales or overvalue purchases to reduce the declared profits – and subsequent tax bill – of the local subsidiary.
 
As international attention has turned to the problem of tax base erosion, the OECD and the United Nations have developed rules and international agreements to prevent transfer mispricing. But how are these rules implemented in mineral-producing African countries?
 
To answer this question, we studied how Ghana, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Tanzania and Zambia have approached the problem. They face some major challenges.
 
First, when legislators draft international rules into national laws, they sometimes do not provide detailed specifications. This leads to uneven application and conflicts with taxpayers.
 
In Zambia, one mining company has exploited the lack of specification on the valuation of copper and cobalt exports sold to related parties to reduce its tax payments by as much as USD 74m.
 
Second, finance ministries and mining sector regulators often fail to coordinate. Different teams within these institutions and even within the tax administration would do well to share information and coordinate audits. This would help to build a comprehensive picture of transfer mispricing risks created by the mining industry.
 
In addition, there are capacity gaps that governments need to close. Even where resources are scarce, the case for investing in tax and transfer pricing experts who can capture tens of millions in fleeing tax revenue is undeniable.
 
Since its establishment in 2012, the international tax unit in Tanzania has generated approximately USD 110m in tax adjustments, with a budget of merely USD 130,000.
 
Another challenge is insufficient access to taxpayers information, originating both from taxpayers themselves and from authorities in foreign jurisdictions. Mineral rich developing countries face the additional challenge of assessing the quality and quantity of mineral exports.
 
Guinea and Sierra Leone, for instance, do not control the grade and humidity of the bauxite and iron ores shipped by mining companies to smelters in Europe, Russia, North America and China. This makes estimating value, and therefore taxes owed, difficult.
 
Amid these challenges, there are some promising developments.
 
In recent years, many civil society activists and engaged members of parliament have identified tax gaps as a major issue and lobbied for stronger rules. Such external oversight can help reinforce the political will to address transfer mispricing and reduce the influence of miners on governments.
 
International initiatives like the OECD’s work on base erosion and profit shifting are integrating developing country concerns with a landmark meeting seeking inputs from developing countries into international tax rules in Kyoto in late June.
 
Regional organizations such as the African Tax Administrations Forum provide both technical assistance to member countries and a platform to develop regional tools and approaches.
 
Some of these approaches are unorthodox, such as the move toward simplified tax rules that rely on publicly quoted mineral prices or set maximum deductibility ratios for a range of mining companies’ typical expenses.
 
However, creative solutions should be welcomed as mineral-rich African countries work to stop long standing practices that drain of public coffers and set back development.
 
Thomas Lassourd is a senior economic analyst at the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI). Alexandra Readhead is a researcher at Oxford University. A full version of the report and case studies are available here.

Related content

'Preventing Tax Base Erosion In Africa' Paper Launch at Oxford

Event type: 
Discussion
Tuesday, October 18, 2016 -
13:00 to 15:00
Oxford, U.K.

Préserver la base d’imposition en Afrique: étude régionale des défis posés par la détermination des prix de transfert dans le secteur minier

5 July 2016
Alexandra Readhead

Preventing Tax Base Erosion In Africa Paper Launch in New York

Wednesday, November 9, 2016 -
09:30 to 11:00
New York, U.S.

Preventing Tax Base Erosion In Africa Paper Launch in Washington, D.C.

Event type: 
Discussion
Thursday, November 10, 2016 -
12:30 to 14:00
Washington, D.C., U.S.

Countries Struggling with Governance Manage $1.2 Trillion in Resource Wealth

David Mihalyi, Anna Fleming
8 September 2017

Recent Tweets

  • NRGInstitute
    NRGInstitute
    @NRGInstitute
    Follow @NRGInstitute
    🛢️ L'exploitation #minière et #pétrolière peut devenir une source de prospérité pour les populations d’un pays : c’… t.co/uAIJ1pDyxu
    6 hours 30 min ago.
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • NRGInstitute
    NRGInstitute
    @NRGInstitute
    Follow @NRGInstitute
    In October over 100 individuals from CSOs signed an agenda with 18 policy asks needed to deliver #GenderEquity in t… t.co/dzb4ukh6Fl
    22 hours 1 min ago.
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • NRGInstitute
    NRGInstitute
    @NRGInstitute
    Follow @NRGInstitute
    🇬🇭 How can #Ghana’s natural resource challenges be addressed with data? 🖥️ Watch this recorded webinar for a prese… t.co/hYd5LeYi8J
    1 day 6 hours ago.
    Reply Retweet Favorite
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Contact us
    • Financials
    • Grant-making
    • Privacy policy
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search