Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Why Extractive Sector Governance Matters in the Resource Productivity Debate

10 January 2014
Author
Waleria Schuele
Topics
Global initiativesMeasurement of environmental and social impacts
Countries
Peru
Stakeholders
Civil society actors
Precepts
P5 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

This year for the first time in its history, the World Resources Forum took place in Latin America. From October 20 to 22, the global forum, which promotes innovation for resource productivity, drew more than 1,000 global participants to Arequipa, a city in southern Peru, to discuss the economic, political, social and environmental implications of resource use.

The issue is a pressing one for Latin America, which is particularly rich in oil, gas and minerals, as well as renewable natural resources. Here, governments face the challenge of transforming extractive wealth for development and at the same time protecting the environment and using renewable natural resources in sustainable ways to benefit present and future generations.

Two key terms emerged at the forum as researchers, policymakers, business leaders and civil society actors took up discussions about this challenge. The first was decoupling, or disconnecting economic growth, which must be sustained, from resource use and environmental and social impacts, which must decrease dramatically.

In 2011 the United Nations Environment Programme published case studies on decoupling efforts in Germany, South Africa, China and Japan. Germany in particular has reduced material and energy costs in its manufacturing industry and public sector, “leading to (net) benefits for the private sector, creating new ‘green’ business fields and jobs, and reducing environmental impacts and social tensions from resource extraction,” according to the report.

The World Resources Forum’s workshops and scientific sessions yielded multiple approaches to achieve decoupling. Participants identified a “ping-pong” strategy between resource productivity and resource prices as a viable path towards this end. Decoupling is also a precondition to tackle climate change. Governments need to take a dynamic multifaceted approach, combining resource efficiency with energy policies and promoting more sustainable production and consumption patterns, participants agreed.

The second key term that emerged at the forum was circular economy, which entails a zero-waste approach throughout the lifecycle of resources. Though achieving the zero-waste goal is quite ambitious, there are examples of business models driving the circular economy. Fast Company wrote that such companies “may well define the future of sustainable business, enabling global prosperity on a crowded planet with finite resources.”

Latin America’s oil, gas and mining industries cannot sit out these important conversations about decoupling, circular economies and sustainability, especially where energy and resource policy is concerned. “As climate change emissions are mostly associated with the use of fossil fuels, little attention is paid to the contribution of the use of non-energetic resources (e.g. metals and minerals) on climate change, although those resources are coupled to energy use throughout their life cycle,” a WRF summary document stated. That includes extraction.

To be successful, we need more debate about extractive sector governance, resource productivity and sustainability.

Waleria Schuele, a fellow of the Mercator Program Center for International Affairs and the German National Academic Foundation, currently works as research stagiere at NRGI’s Latin America regional office in Lima.

Related content

Latin American Extractives Forum Highlights Civil Society Importance, Key Trends

Alonso Hidalgo
8 March 2017

En un futuro bajo en carbono, una mejor gobernanza de los minerales podría impulsar el desarrollo

Alex TilleyDavid Manley
27 September 2017

In a Low-Carbon Future, Better Mineral Governance Could Power Development

Alex TilleyDavid Manley
27 September 2017

Open Contracting for Oil, Gas and Mineral Rights: Shining a Light on Good Practice

26 June 2018

Passation de marchés ouverte pour les droits pétroliers, gaziers et miniers: gros plan sur les bonnes pratiques

28 June 2018
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search