Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Analysis & Tools
  3. Publications

Institutional Design in Low-Capacity Oil Hotspots

31 August 2012
Author
Patrick HellerValerie Marcel
Download
Institutional Design in Low-Capacity Oil Hotspots (PDF 596.96 KB)
Presentation: System Design for National Oil Companies (PDF 522.61 KB)
Topics
Legislation and regulationState-owned enterprises
Countries
AngolaBrazilDem. Rep. of CongoGabonGhanaLiberiaMozambiqueNigeriaSierra LeoneTimor-LesteUganda
Stakeholders
Civil society actorsGovernment officialsParliaments and political parties
Precepts
P1 P6 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

From Ghana to Timor-Leste, many new or prospective oil producers are establishing or reforming national oil companies (NOCs). Their governments are looking at the experience of existing producers to choose an institutional design that can effectively manage their NOCs and foreign oil companies while minimizing governance risks. However, research on NOC governance has focused almost exclusively on large, well-established oil producers such as Saudi Arabia and Norway, which have geological prospects and institutional capacity levels that may make them difficult for the world’s new oil hotspots to emulate.

The context is substantially different in most new or prospective producers, where administrative, human and oil-sector capacity are generally low. These governments face daunting challenges in light of their capacity constraints. Which body do they task with licensing, regulatory and monitoring responsibilities: the NOC, the ministry of oil or a separate regulatory agency? In cases of weak capacity, governments face the dilemma of either concentrating responsibilities and resources in order to build capacity quickly within a single institution, or separating functions to build the foundations for good governance. We offer five research propositions on the connections between country capacity and effective oil-sector institutional design to allow governments to more effectively structure their decisions about how to manage petroleum resources.

inst design slide
When power over the oil sector is shifted from a single institution to a separation of powers, it is important to proceed sequentially and cautiously. See more slides from the presentation here (pdf).

Key Recommendations

  • Low-capacity countries have a stronger history of technical and economic success when resources are concentrated in the NOC, rather than rigidly separated across distinct administrative bodies.
  • Too much concentration of power can exacerbate accountability problems. Successful implementation of a separation-of-powers model can improve accountability, but many attempts to install such a model fail to take root.
  • Surrogate administrative capacity may be needed to prop up a separation-of-powers model in low-capacity countries.
  • Sequencing matters. Some countries may elect to concentrate powers initially and then separate them later. The likelihood of success of such an effort depends largely on whether other institutions have developed the strength to be an effective check on the NOC by the time the attempt is made to separate.
  • Concentration of power within a ministry—as opposed to separation of powers or concentration within an NOC—represents the path of least resistance in many low-capacity countries, but its chances of success are poor when there is limited administrative capacity.

Download a brief presentation featuring key recommendations from this RWI analysis. (pdf)

Related content

Countries Struggling with Governance Manage $1.2 Trillion in Resource Wealth

David MihalyiAnna Fleming
8 September 2017

Resource Governance Index: Sub-Saharan Africa Highlights

31 January 2019

Resource Governance Index: From Legal Reform to Implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa

Report
15 April 2019

The 2021 Resource Governance Index Research Process is Underway

Liz McGrathAnna Fleming
13 July 2020

The Case for Publishing Petroleum Contracts in Nigeria

1 March 2018
Robert PitmanAnne Chinweze
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search