Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Advanced
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. News

Switzerland Adopts Extractive Sector Transparency Law, Opens Door To Improved Commodities Trading Transparency

Press Release
19 June 2020
Topics
Commodity pricesCorruption
Stakeholders
Government officialsPrivate sector
Social Sharing
LONDON—The Swiss parliament today adopted a new law requiring Swiss extractive companies to disclose the payments they make to governments around the world. The law covers payments made for the right to explore for and extract oil, gas and minerals.
 
The new law is aligned with rules already in place in Canada, the European Union, Norway and the United Kingdom. Together these laws have led to the disclosure of over USD 900 billion in taxes, royalties and other payments made to governments worldwide since 2015. The United States also has an extractives payment transparency law in place but implementation has been beset by legislative and legal challenges for almost a decade.
 
The laws are designed to assist citizens in demanding that their governments use public funds to fight poverty and contribute to sustained economic growth, rather than lose crucial revenues to corruption or mismanagement. Investors also use the disclosures to manage risk.
 
Switzerland is a major commodities trading hub. The new law, part of a new package of wider reforms on Swiss company law, includes an important clause which delegates authority to the Federal Council, the country’s executive, to apply the new transparency provisions to Swiss commodity traders buying oil, gas and minerals abroad. The council can activate this part of the law as part of an international process by which authorities in other major trading hubs would make a similar move.
 
Joseph Williams, advocacy manager at NRGI said: “While Switzerland has opted not to include commodity trading payments directly in this new law, it has thrown down the gauntlet to other major trading hubs such as the Netherlands, Singapore, the United Kingdom and United States. Switzerland has sent an important signal today and it is time for international action to make the massive payments that traders make to governments open to citizen oversight.”
 
Williams continued: “There is no time to waste. With the economies of resource-rich countries under immense strain given the coronavirus pandemic, falling oil prices and the challenge of moving to a low-carbon future, transparent oversight of every dollar made from the extraction or sale of natural resources is crucial.”
 
Payments made by commodity traders like Vitol and Trafigura and the trading divisions of international oil companies like BP and Shell to government-controlled national oil companies (NOCs) are significant and can constitute a government’s largest revenue stream in countries like Angola, Iraq, Libya and Nigeria. Recent NRGI research into ten NOCs found that in 2018 oil and gas sales amounted to over 70 percent of these countries’ overall income, totaling over USD 860 billion.
 
At the same time, these transactions are subject to major corruption risks which can result in citizens being robbed of revenues. In 2019 it was reported that the U.S. Department of Justice was investigating an oil trader working for Brazil’s NOC, Petrobras, who has been charged in Brazil with “taking part in a corruption scheme involving commodity traders Vitol, Glencore and Trafigura.” Traders often also extend credit to resource-rich countries in return for oil, gas or minerals in the form of resource-backed loans. Some of these deals have been criticized and deserve greater scrutiny, particularly given the debt crises resource-dependent countries are suffering during the pandemic.
 
“To have a real impact, the Swiss should activate the extension of the law to include commodities trading payments swiftly,” Williams said. “Without this, the current provisions focused on upstream payments will only cover a handful of additional companies beyond those already reporting in other jurisdictions. Similarly, the world’s other major commodities trading hubs have a responsibility to ensure companies under their jurisdiction report payments to state entities. Only three trading companies have voluntarily disclosed some relevant transactions to date which is wholly inadequate.”
 
Other authorities have made moves toward greater transparency in commodities trading payments. Last year the U.K. committed to “establish and implement a common global reporting standard” on payments to governments for the sale of oil, gas and minerals. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has acknowledged the significance of these payments and has an opportunity to include them in final rules for its own transparency law expected later this year. The European Commission is currently reviewing its own payment transparency regime and has previously committed to improve company reporting in this area. Next week the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development will host a meeting on the role of trading hubs and commodity trading companies in addressing corruption risks in commodity trading transactions. Finally, the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, which has required its member governments to disclose sales of oil, gas and minerals for a number of years, is currently working on guidance for firms that purchase resources to improve their own voluntary disclosures.
 
“The architecture is there for action, what is needed now is the political will to make it happen. Switzerland’s new law should now be the impetus for rapid progress,” said Williams.
 
For more information contact:
 

Lee Bailey
Communications Director
[email protected]
+44 (0)7823 442 954 
 
Joseph Williams
Advocacy Manager
[email protected]
+44 (0)7775 751 170 

Related content

Tender Moment for Oil Sale Governance in Nigeria

Aaron Sayne
19 October 2016

At International Anti-Corruption Conference, Calls for Sustained—and Heightened—Vigilance

Max George-Wagner
16 December 2016

Natural Resource Charter Benchmarking Framework: 170 Crucial Questions for Resource-Rich Countries

Robert PitmanDavid Manley
17 October 2016

En un futuro bajo en carbono, una mejor gobernanza de los minerales podría impulsar el desarrollo

Alex TilleyDavid Manley
27 September 2017

In a Low-Carbon Future, Better Mineral Governance Could Power Development

Alex TilleyDavid Manley
27 September 2017
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search