Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Global initiatives
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Legislation and regulation
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Licensing and negotiation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Myanmar
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Nigeria
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Peru
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Advanced
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Contact us
    • Financials
    • Grant-making
    • Privacy policy
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Philippines: Will TRAIN Run Over the Mining Sector?

14 February 2018
Author
Thomas Lassourd, Marco Zaplan
Topics
Tax policy and revenue collection
Countries
Philippines
Stakeholders
Civil society actors, Government officials, Parliaments and political parties, Private sector
Precepts
P4 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

In his July 2017 State of the Nation Address, Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte said he would tax miners to “death.” In December 2017, he signed Republic Act 10963—Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN)—the first of six packages of a comprehensive program. TRAIN took effect on 1 January.

Under the new tax system, mining companies that extract metallic or non-metallic minerals are now subject to a 4 percent excise tax on the value of their production—double the previous rate. This excise tax is equivalent to what most countries would label a “royalty” on mineral production. What does this 100 percent increase mean for the sector?

National and local impacts of higher excise taxes on minerals

Agata Mining Ventures (which operates in Agusan del Norte) paid 50,206,025 Philippine pesos (approximately USD 1 million) in excise taxes in 2016, according to the Fourth Philippine Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (PH-EITI) Report. Assuming production and the price of the iron ore/nickel product it exports remain similar through 2018, it would then pay twice that amount to the government this year. Local government units (LGUs) hosting the Agata project are entitled to 40 percent of excise taxes, as is the case for all other LGUs. Under the new law and using the same assumption as above, Agata’s host LGUs could see their share from excise tax increase from an estimated PHP 20,082,410 (USD 390,000) to PHP 40,164,820 (USD 780,000).

The company’s feasibility study forecasts the a 10-year mine life for the Agata project. Assuming the average price of production according to the latest company’s consolidated financial statements, USD USD 18.6 USD per wet metric tonne, is the average price of production for those 10 years, the project would be paying about PHP 371 million (USD 7.2 million) in excise taxes under the new regime, instead of PHP 186 million (USD 3.6 million) before TRAIN.

The impact would be even more significant on larger projects, such as the King-king copper-gold project in the Compostela Valley province. Using assumptions from the 2013 preliminary feasibility study with updated gold, silver and copper prices, doubling the excise taxes could mean doubling the expected collection of excise payments from the company over the 22-year life of the project, from PHP 15.5 billion to PHP 31 billion (USD 300 to 600 million). Forty percent, or an estimated PHP 12.4 billion, would go to LGUs while the remaining PHP 18.6 billion would go to the national coffers.

In our simulations, both Agata and King-king would still be profitable to investors after considering the additional excise tax payments. But some marginal mining projects may be forced to close.

No mine is spared from the new tax hike. According to the fourth PH-EITI report (which covered 88 percent of total mineral production in the country), the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) collected PHP 1.4 billion (USD 27 million) in excise taxes on minerals in 2016. Assuming production volumes and prices in 2018 are similar to 2016 figures, BIR should see collections of at least PHP 2.8 billion (USD 54 million) from excise taxes on minerals.

Provided the transfer of LGU shares from excise tax on minerals is sufficient and timely, the impact will be the biggest for host LGUs. However, because excise taxes are deductible expenses, companies would declare smaller profits and pay less income tax. Income tax is typically more evenly shared among the population and other jurisdictions via the government’s national budget. As a result, the net impact of higher excise taxes on the Philippines treasury should be positive, but more so for resource-rich than resource-poor regions.

More to come?

The doubling of excise taxes on minerals may just be the tip of the iceberg for mining companies.

There are pending bills filed in both the Senate and House of Representatives that plan to impose 5 percent mineral royalties on all mining operations on top of the excise tax on minerals and other taxes paid by mining companies. Under the current policy, only companies operating in government-declared mineral reservations pay the 5 percent mineral royalties. In the PH-EITI report, only eight companies had reconciled payments for fiscal year 2016 that amounted to PHP 839 million (USD 16 million). If all companies were subject to the 5 percent royalty on the value of their production, the same base as the excise tax on minerals, the government could collect an estimated PHP 3.9 billion (USD 76 million).

The Department of Finance is planning to introduce additional changes in the mining fiscal regime in the final tax reform package, possibly imposing additional royalties and other fees. PH-EITI Focal Person and Assistant Secretary Maria Teresa S. Habitan in a press conference said the department will push through with its studies to propose a new mining fiscal regime.

As the Department of Finance studies new or increased taxes for the mining sector, it might consider some general principles from Precept 4 of the Natural Resource Charter.

Increasing excise taxes or royalties is a practical way of quickly increasing revenue collection, especially for local governments. It also makes marginal mineral deposits too expensive to exploit, and therefore slows down intensive mineral extraction. Pacing extraction could give the government leeway to progressively strengthen its rules and institutions. But if the goal of the government is to capture a greater share of mining revenues without restricting investment, the DoF should consider instead scrapping unnecessary incentives (like income tax holidays) and introducing more progressive taxes (such as resource-rent or windfall profit taxes that would only apply to highly profitable mines).

Please note USD to PHP conversions are made using the official exchange rate of the Central Bank of the Philippines on 6 February 2018.

Marco Zaplan is a technical policy specialist at the Department of Finance - Philippine Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Thomas Lassourd is a senior economic analyst at the Natural Resource Governance Institute.

Related content

Takeaways from EITI 2016: Contract Transparency Is Becoming Norm

Paulo Cunha, Gavin Hayman, Robert Pitman
9 March 2016

Past the Tipping Point? Contract Disclosure within EITI

2 March 2017
Robert Pitman, Don Hubert

Countries Struggling with Governance Manage $1.2 Trillion in Resource Wealth

David Mihalyi, Anna Fleming
8 September 2017

Open Contracting for Oil, Gas and Mineral Rights: Shining a Light on Good Practice

26 June 2018

Passation de marchés ouverte pour les droits pétroliers, gaziers et miniers: gros plan sur les bonnes pratiques

28 June 2018

Recent Tweets

  • NRGInstitute
    NRGInstitute
    @NRGInstitute
    Follow @NRGInstitute
    🛢️ L'exploitation #minière et #pétrolière peut devenir une source de prospérité pour les populations d’un pays : c’… t.co/uAIJ1pDyxu
    4 hours 51 min ago.
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • NRGInstitute
    NRGInstitute
    @NRGInstitute
    Follow @NRGInstitute
    In October over 100 individuals from CSOs signed an agenda with 18 policy asks needed to deliver #GenderEquity in t… t.co/dzb4ukh6Fl
    20 hours 22 min ago.
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • NRGInstitute
    NRGInstitute
    @NRGInstitute
    Follow @NRGInstitute
    🇬🇭 How can #Ghana’s natural resource challenges be addressed with data? 🖥️ Watch this recorded webinar for a prese… t.co/hYd5LeYi8J
    1 day 4 hours ago.
    Reply Retweet Favorite
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Myanmar
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Contact us
    • Financials
    • Grant-making
    • Privacy policy
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search