Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Analysis & Tools
  3. Publications

Can Mongolia’s Fiscal Stability Council Improve Fiscal Discipline?

Briefing
12 September 2018
Author
Munkhsoyol Baatarjav
Download
Can Mongolia’s Fiscal Stability Council Improve Fiscal Discipline? (PDF 897.1 KB)
Topics
Commodity pricesRevenue managementRevenue sharingTax policy and revenue collection
Countries
Mongolia
Stakeholders
Civil society actorsGovernment officialsParliaments and political parties
Precepts
P1 P7 P8 P9 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

Монгол »

Mongolia is one of the most mining-dependent countries in the world. In addition to economic growth, jobs and government revenue, mining has also brought challenges to Mongolia. Resource revenues are volatile, which can lead to boom-bust cycles. Populist politics oftentimes incentivizes politicians to use finite resource revenue for immediate consumption rather than investing in long-term projects or a sovereign wealth fund. Addressing the challenges of volatility and exhaustibility requires a long-term policy to decide how much revenue to invest for the future, how much to spend on development projects and how much to disperse through other mechanisms.
 
Mongolia has developed a number of policies to manage resource revenues, including multiple fiscal rules and sovereign wealth funds, as well as distribution of resource revenues via direct cash transfers to citizens. In practice, the effectiveness of these tools has been weak. As a cornerstone of its revenue management policy, Mongolia adopted the Fiscal Stability Law in 2010, specifying multiple fiscal rules, including explicit debt, budget balance and expenditure growth limits. However, the government has modified these fiscal rules multiple times. Most recently, in 2016, it adjusted rules to accommodate its failure to meet its original budget targets. To date, there is no independent agency tasked with monitoring the rules or evaluating the sustainability of fiscal policy. A low score on the revenue management measure of the 2017 Resource Governance Index highlights the weaknesses of the fiscal rules and sovereign wealth fund governance. This contributed to the country being largely unprepared for the recent fall of commodity prices, which ultimately pushed the country into a debt crisis.
 
Last December, the Mongolian parliament adopted a resolution to establish the Fiscal Stability Council (FSC) and approved its bylaws. The establishment of the FSC is an important step toward enhanced oversight. However, comparing the Mongolian bylaws to international standards reveals a number of shortcomings in the functions, transparency and safeguards of independence of the proposed FSC. This briefing makes a series of recommendations with regard to the design and implementation of the FSC.

Related content

Ongoing Dialogue on the Role of Mongolia’s Fiscal Stability Council

Dorjdari Namkhaijantsan
18 September 2018

Төсвийн тогтвортой байдлын зөвлөл Монгол Улсын төсвийн сахилга батыг сайжруулж чадах уу?

18 September 2018
Munkhsoyol Baatarjav

Mongolia Macro-fiscal Model

At International Anti-Corruption Conference, Calls for Sustained—and Heightened—Vigilance

Max George-Wagner
16 December 2016

Natural Resource Charter Benchmarking Framework: 170 Crucial Questions for Resource-Rich Countries

Robert PitmanDavid Manley
17 October 2016
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search