Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Mongolia Reaffirms Commitment to Publish Mining, Petroleum Contracts

3 May 2019
Author
Robert PitmanDorjdari Namkhaijantsan
Topics
Contract transparency and monitoringLegislation and regulationLicensing and negotiationOpen dataTax policy and revenue collection
Countries
Mongolia
Stakeholders
Civil society actorsGovernment officialsJournalists and mediaParliaments and political partiesPrivate sector
Precepts
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P11 P12 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

Монгол »

At the formal launch of the ResourceContracts.mn contracts portal on 22 April, Mongolia’s deputy minister of mines and heavy industry reaffirmed the country’s commitment to publishing mining and petroleum contracts and announced the public release of over 150 new contracts. After several years of stuttering progress on contract transparency in Mongolia, this is welcome news.

D.Zagdjav said the release of these contracts would “contribute extensively to the improvement of accountability and law enforcement in the sector, and reduce corruption and conflict of interest risks.”

He also said the portal would contain “all contracts… starting from larger agreements concluded at the government level, such as investment and production-sharing agreements, to those established by license holders at the local government level.”

Mongolia’s Deputy Minister of Mines and Heavy Industry D.Zagdjav speaks at the launch event on 22 April. Photo courtesy of the Ministry of Mines and Heavy Industry.

Directly prior the launch, the government, working in collaboration with project partners Mongolia EITI and Open Society Forum Mongolia, published a further 162 Mongolian language contracts on the repository. Among the new additions are five cooperation agreements, three investment agreements, 11 stabilization agreements, 66 reimbursement agreements, 51 pre-mining agreements and—perhaps most notably—all 25 active petroleum production sharing agreements, or PSAs.

Though important progress has been made, the government still has a long way to go until all contracts are public.

As we demonstrated in a brief earlier this year, the lion’s share of the contracts published are those made by local government authorities concerning aspects of land and water use, environmental protection, infrastructure development and employment. These are helpful, particularly for local communities. But the most significant contracts from a taxation perspective are those made with the central government. So far most of these remain secret, while some of the disclosures that have been made are missing important information. The PSAs, for example, have been heavily redacted, removing useful information such as fiscal terms.

To their credit, government officials recognize these shortcomings and appear to be taking steps to address them.

The government of Mongolia is not just publishing contracts. It is also supporting initiatives to encourage contract use. Photo courtesy of the Ministry of Mines and Heavy Industry.

D.Lkhamjav, head of the law division at the Ministry of Mines and Heavy Industry, noted that redactions in the PSAs are temporary and will be removed as soon as the government reaches agreement with existing PSA holders. She also said confidentiality clauses requiring agreement by both parties to enable disclosure have been taken out of the model PSAs—templates that the Mongolian authorities are using for future production-sharing agreements—and will therefore not be included in any new contracts.

Most importantly, the government of Mongolia is not just publishing contracts. It is also supporting initiatives to encourage contract use. At an event on 23 April, the ministry was a lead organizer of a day of discussions examining how to improve the implementation of local level agreements. The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative national council and local community representatives participated, as well.

These discussions revealed that local communities are using published contracts to monitor commitments and hold companies accountable for what they have promised. Rather than being a drag on operations, companies and the central government reported that these monitoring activities have actually improved community relationships, making their work much easier. A summary of key lessons learned from such monitoring activities and other capacity building efforts is highlighted in Local Level Agreements in Mongolia’s Resource Sector: Lessons Learned and the Way Forward. (The report is also available in Mongolian.)

Government action on contract transparency is timely given national OGP commitments and global developments in EITI. Mongolia made a commitment to the “transparency of contracts of public resource exploitation” in its 2016-2018 Open Government Partnership National Action Plan, and looks set to renew this commitment in the country’s upcoming 2019-2021 National Action Plan.

Within EITI, the initiative’s board agreed to significantly improve the EITI requirements on contract transparency in Kyiv in February. Once the board ratifies it at the EITI Global Conference in June, the new EITI standard will include a requirement for implementing countries to disclose all contracts and licenses that they grant, enter into or amend from 1 January 2021. It also includes an expectation for EITI multi-stakeholder groups to agree and publish a plan for disclosing contracts.

If the recent flurry of activity is anything to go by, the prospects for comprehensive contract transparency in Mongolia are good.

Rob Pitman is a governance officer with the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI). Dorjdari Namkhaijantsan is the Mongolia manager with NRGI.

Related content

Three Ways Companies Can Make 2019 a Big Year for Contract Transparency

Robert Pitman
30 January 2019

Монгол Улс уул уурхай, газрын тосны гэрээг нийтэд нээлттэй болгох амлалтаа дахин баталгаажууллаа

Robert PitmanDorjdari Namkhaijantsan
8 May 2019

Mongolia's Missing Oil, Gas and Mining Contracts

Briefing
11 February 2019
Robert Pitman

Бодлогын хураангуй: Монгол Улсын газрын тос, уул уурхайн ил болоогүй гэрээнүүд

11 February 2019
Robert Pitman

Natural Resource Charter Benchmarking Framework: 170 Crucial Questions for Resource-Rich Countries

Robert PitmanDavid Manley
17 October 2016
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search