NOCs already produce more than half the world’s oil and gas (with that share expected to rise), and that they represent the economic backbone of many producer countries; failing to include them and/or the barriers and solutions to their transformation undermines the prospect for roadmaps to deliver a fair, orderly, and equitable transition.

An NRGI delegation was in attendance, and we will be sharing further analysis in the weeks ahead. Today, we are sharing some of our top-line reactions:

For the first time, Global South producer realities were centered

"Santa Marta opened up an important conversation about what is at stake for Global South producer countries—energy independence, less instability, more inclusive and equitable development—and brought in voices that are often missing, like subnational governments," said Ana Carolina González, NRGI's Senior Director for Programs and Latin America Director.

For the first time, a major international forum placed the realities affecting communities in Global South producer countries at the center of the transition debate: fiscal dependence on oil and gas revenues, the instability that comes with price volatility, and what it will take to ensure the shift away from fossil fuels works for the people most affected by it. Importantly, subnational governments had a seat at the table. In many oil-producing regions, the transition is not a future concern—it is already arriving. In the oil producing regions of Campeche in Mexico or Putumayo in Colombia production has declined significantly. Where royalties account for 70–80% of local budgets, like in Niger Delta, a drop in production can mean schools with fewer teachers, roads that go unrepaired and workers facing an uncertain future. These are the communities that contributed least to the climate crisis. They should not be the ones absorbing its costs.

With conflict in the Middle East fueling oil price spikes and energy security fears, the current crisis made the case for an orderly transition stronger. As González put it: "For producer governments, high prices may create pressure to double down on fossil fuel investment. But volatility is not stability and short-term gains are not long-term strategy. The window to plan an orderly transition is open—the question is whether governments use it."

National oil companies: a missing piece

The co-host takeaways noted that participants "stressed the importance of clear policy signals and long-term planning, including clearer strategies for State-Owned Enterprises." At the final press conference, Colombia's Minister of Mines and Energy Irene Vélez Torres acknowledged that NOCs "should be part of the roadmap, because this is where the production takes place. So we hope that the countries can think about how their own companies should be included and should have targets of transition."

These are welcome signals. But recognizing that NOCs need clearer strategies is not the same as bringing them in as essential partners, and the gap between limited acknowledgement and meaningful inclusion is where credible transition planning can break down.

"NOCs are not peripheral players," says González. "They produce more than half of the world's oil and gas and that share projected to rise to 62% by 2050. NOCs are the economic backbone of many producer countries. The next step must bring them in as essential partners in any credible transition roadmap."

In many producer countries, NOCs underpin national budgets, jobs, public services and local economic stability. In Colombia, Ecopetrol alone contributed the equivalent of around 11% of the national budget in 2023, more than the country allocated to the education sector. Pemex directly employs over 128,000 people, with oil dominating the economy of states like Campeche, where it accounts for the vast majority of local economic activity.

Around $400 billion in planned NOC investment between 2023 and 2032 may not break even if demand falls in line with climate commitments. In some countries, more than 80% of planned investments are at risk. Leaving NOCs outside transition planning does not protect them or the economies that depend on them—it simply means the risks accumulate without a strategy for managing them. NRGI's recent report, NOC Transformation: Strategic Choices for an Uncertain Energy Future, offers a practical framework for how governments and NOCs can navigate this moment together.

What comes next

The co-host's takeaway note from Santa Marta does recognize that “clearer strategies for State-Owned-Enterprises" (which include NOCs) are important for long-term transition planning. The conclusions of Santa Marta will now feed into COP31, with Brazil’s COP30 presidency committed to building on the outcomes from Santa Marta in the roadmap it will deliver to this year’s annual UN climate conference (COP31) in Turkey. The Brazilian COP30 Presidency’s roadmap report cannot leave national oil companies on the sidelines. And, we need to ensure that spaces that meaningfully centre the needs of communities most exposed to the transition become the rule, not a welcome exception. The road ahead is long, but the direction is clearer—and Santa Marta moved it forward.

The energy transition is happening. It is also, depending on your perspective, too slow, too fast, too expensive, or something else entirely. As the governments of Colombia and The Netherlands convene the first-ever conference dedicated to transitioning away from fossil fuels in Santa Marta, that ambition is running up against a charged reality: oil price spike, land grabs, geopolitical jockeying for resources and mounting debt in many producer countries.

NRGI’s work is grounded in the recognition that how the transition unfolds—and how quickly—will determine whether it contributes to fair, inclusive and more prosperous societies, while acknowledging that communities that have contributed least to the climate crisis too often stand to lose the most. There is not one transition. There are transitions—shaped by very different starting points, economic realities and development priorities. Those gathering in Santa Marta must consider these diverse perspectives, including from communities, countries and regions that are not always fully represented in these debates.

Three of our regional directors reflect on how the transition is unfolding in practice, drawing on two decades of work on resource governance.

How are governments approaching the transition in the current context?

Santa Marta's organizers argue that current conflicts reinforce rather than sideline the case for transition. For governments navigating oil price uncertainty, rising energy demand and immediate security pressures, however, the picture is more complicated.

Africa—Nafi Quarshie, Africa Director

"African governments are navigating a dual reality that is shaping their approach to the energy transition. On one hand, oil price volatility is exposing how fragile current development models are. When revenues drop, it directly affects governments' ability to fund basic services like health and education, and this is prompting some reflection on the risk of continued dependence on oil and gas. On the other hand, geopolitical shifts—particularly following the Russia-Ukraine war—have made African hydrocarbons more strategically valuable. Increased global demand, especially for LNG, is pushing many governments to expand production in the short term."

The result is what Nafi calls a hedging strategy: transition commitments on paper, new extraction deals in practice. In Nigeria alone, around 70 to 80% of government revenue comes from the oil sector and, across the continent, oil and gas still underpin national budgets and public services. For countries in this position, the absence of credible, financed alternatives is the real constraint—not a lack of ambition.

"The issue is not a lack of willingness to transition, but rather the lack of credible, financed alternatives. The priority now is ensuring that near-term resource revenues actively support long-term economic diversification rather than deepening dependency."

Latin America—Ana Carolina González Espinosa, Latin America Director and Senior Director for Programs

In Latin America, the starting point looks different. The region already has one of the cleanest energy matrices globally, and major oil-producing countries—Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Trinidad and Tobago—have expressed interest in defining roadmaps for a just and orderly transition beyond fossil fuels, a conversation that until very recently was considered taboo. But that leadership is now being tested by the current energy crisis.

"The region is positioning itself strongly in the global energy market. The capacity of Brazil, Guyana, Argentina and even Venezuela to expand hydrocarbon production and respond to gaps created by conflict in the Middle East could generate significant revenues. But many oil-exporting countries—such as Colombia or Mexico—are also importers of refined products or gas, meaning their economies are hit from both sides. The response from some policymakers has been to increase production and consider new projects to maximize revenues and ensure self-sufficiency. But this also exposes countries to significant long-term risks."

MENA—Laury Haytayan, MENA Director

Across the Middle East, the question for many producers is not when to phase out oil and gas—it is whether that is even the right conversation.

"MENA producing countries, and their national oil companies have been very clear about their position vis-à-vis the energy transition. They have been saying that there is not one transition. There are transitions, each country according to its capacities. On top of that, they talk about energy additions. According to MENA producers, the world economy is still guided and fueled by fossil fuels—therefore, any deployment of renewable or clean energy is coming on top of oil and gas demand."

The Hormuz crisis has made that position harder to shift. With Gulf export routes disrupted, the priority is securing supply—not winding it down. Meanwhile, countries actively diversifying are doing so on their own terms, moving national oil companies into petrochemicals and renewables while maintaining oil production.

“Countries like Saudi Arabia are working hard to diversify their economies. But it takes billions of dollars—and time, vision and discipline—to build a parallel economy.”

What does a just transition mean in practice?

Santa Marta’s call for a transition that leaves no one behind puts equity and finance at the center. For all three directors, the challenge is turning that principle into reality.

Nafi Quarshie

"Good resource governance today is no longer just about managing revenues well. It is about managing decline, uncertainty and transition. That requires stronger institutions, better data and sustained civic engagement to ensure that short-term resource decisions are aligned with long-term economic transformation."

That shift is visible in NRGI's work across the region—from supporting analysis on long-term revenue risk in Senegal, to helping governments and civil society confront the structural costs of fossil fuel dependence in Nigeria and Ghana—and in the question COP30 left unanswered: who pays in countries that contributed least to the problem.

"A just transition in Africa is not just about moving away from fossil fuels. It is about building economies that work for people. And that requires coordinated action now to align finance, policy and institutions with that reality."

Ana Carolina González Espinosa

For Ana Carolina, a just transition in Latin America is both an environmental and an economic necessity. The global energy transition puts at risk a sector central to the region's economies, and the current high prices carry a warning: they may also accelerate the transition.

"It is essential that we adopt a bold approach to this moment. The space that Latin America has occupied in the discussion on the energy transition can be a source of many opportunities that decision-makers must seize—to attract investment toward new sectors, to transform national oil companies into drivers of new energy models, and to define new pathways to prosperity in oil-producing regions where economic activity is already in decline."

Venezuela serves as a cautionary tale of what happens when strong democratic institutions are absent and revenues are not used to diversify. Mexico and Brazil show a different path for diversification is possible. But there is no single route, even within the region.

"There is no single pathway for the transition... For hydrocarbon-producing countries, it is not only an energy transformation, but also an economic one. This is more urgent in countries with low production and declining reserves, such as Mexico and Colombia—and particularly at the subnational level, where decline is already being felt in places like Loreto in Peru, Putumayo in Colombia and Campeche in Mexico."

Laury Haytayan

In MENA, countries are not engaging with just transition in the way Santa Marta frames it—and the response of European governments to the Hormuz crisis is reinforcing that gap.

"The moment European governments faced the crisis, they automatically ran to their producer—Italy to Algeria, for instance—asking them to increase production. These are signs that empower companies and producing countries in the region to say: oil and gas are still needed, even for Europe."

The risk, Laury argues, is mistaking short-term demand for a long-term trend. In Tunisia, meanwhile, a different understanding of just transition is taking shape—focused not on phase-out, but on who benefits from new energy systems.

“Communities are part of the decision-making around these new renewable projects. They want to be heard, they want to be part of decision-making and they want to see the benefits of these projects before these new energies are exported to Europe or to other markets.”

Looking ahead

Santa Marta aims to drive a just and orderly transition away from fossil fuels. But countries are not starting from the same place—and many are not moving in the same direction.

The transition will not be decided by ambition alone—it will depend on whether governments can navigate the trade-offs they face today, and whether international cooperation can match those realities.

 

This Q&A is part of NRGI's 20th anniversary series, produced in conjunction with the Santa Marta conference on pathways beyond oil and gas, 28–29 April 2026.

As global energy debates become increasingly polarized, governments are pulling in different directions. Some are advancing plans to transition away from fossil fuels—including Brazil’s COP30 roadmaps process and the upcoming Santa Marta conference organized by Colombia and The Netherlands—while others are doubling down on oil and gas for fiscal stability and energy security. National Oil Companies (NOCs)—which produce more than half of the world’s oil and gas—lie at the heart of these debates and of the choices countries now face.  

But beyond political narratives, the energy system is already shifting. For instance, in 2025 twice as much capital flowed to renewables and related technologies compared to oil, coal and natural gas.

And while the conflict in the Middle East has pushed oil prices above $100 a barrel, boosting short-term revenues for some NOCs, future demand remains uncertain, even if it is expected to peak around 2030.

For NOCs, this is a defining moment. Charting a path forward that balances fiscal risk and opportunity, and unlocks inclusive development at this moment of extreme uncertainty is vital—for governments, NOC executives and citizens in oil and gas producing countries. 

Our new report, National Oil Company Transformation: Strategic Choices for an Uncertain Energy Future, explores how governments can define transformation pathways that align NOC strategy with national development priorities in an increasingly volatile energy system, building on two decades of experience and country examples.

The future of oil and gas is increasingly the future of NOCs 

NOCs produced about 54 percent of global oil and 50 percent of gas in 2025, with their combined share projected to rise to around 62 percent by 2050. 

This dominance reflects structural advantages: large, low-cost reserves and sustained investment capacity. In 2025, NOCs spent more than US$240 billion in capital expenditure—more than oil majors (US$73 billion) and independent producers (US$109 billion) combined. As private firms scale back or divest, NOCs are increasingly taking on a larger share of global assets.

 This growing role creates opportunity but also risk. What once looked like market leverage—greater control over supply and investment—now increases public exposure in a context of energy uncertainty. 

Business as usual is no longer a neutral strategy

NRGI has previously warned that long-lived, capital-intensive oil and gas investments by NOCs risk becoming unprofitable under faster transition scenarios. This risk is already visible. Projects approved under more optimistic demand expectations can generate much lower returns if market conditions turn out weaker.

Recent modelling illustrates the scale of this exposure. As the figure below shows, even under relatively moderate transition assumptions, some NOCs could see projected company value—based on expected future cash flows—decline by more than 50 percent.

This reflects a core challenge: while NOCs cannot control how demand evolves, their investment decisions determine how exposed they are. Unlike oil majors, which face shareholder and legal pressures that can constrain capital allocation, NOCs often operate under political and fiscal pressures to sustain production, revenues and employment, even as uncertainty grows.

For governments that rely on NOCs for development, this makes business-as-usual far from neutral. Asset devaluation at NOCs carries real public costs—weakening balance sheets and shrinking fiscal space for healthcare, education and economic diversification.

When planning for decline is delayed, these risks become harder to manage. The burden often falls on subnational regions and communities through job losses, reduced revenues and limited alternatives.

In this context, short-term gains from high oil prices can mask longer-term vulnerabilities. Uncertainty will shape the sector. The real issue is how prepared countries are to respond.

Why NOC transformation matters now

Vast oil and gas reserves do not translate into development on their own. In some cases, governments have used NOCs to drive more industrial activity and capture more value domestically. In others, weak governance had led to inefficiencies, political capture and fiscal risk. 

Today, the stakes are higher. The energy transition is narrowing the window to use hydrocarbon wealth for long-term economic transformation. Delaying decisions about a NOC’s future role risks channeling short-term profits into activities that fail to deliver lasting benefits for citizens before market conditions tighten. At the same time, the opportunity to use these revenues to support diversification and low-carbon transformation pathways may not remain open indefinitely.

NOCs are not a single type of actor. They differ widely in mandates, resource bases, capabilities, governance and exposure to transition risks—and in how they recognize and respond to these challenges.

The question is no longer whether NOCs should transform, but how. What matters is identifying pathways that are fiscally credible, aligned with national development goals, politically feasible, and part of a fair and orderly energy transition. Our new report sets out a practical framework to help governments navigate these choices.

For countries advancing national transition roadmaps, including under the COP30 Brazilian Presidency, NOC reform offers a concrete way to connect climate ambition with fiscal and development strategy. But even for those continuing to invest in fossil fuels, clarifying the future role of the NOC is equally essential to managing long-term risk. 

From insight to action

These are decisions countries are already facing—and often without a clear strategy. NRGI’s National Oil Company Transformation: Strategic Choices for an Uncertain Energy Future report provides detailed analysis, country examples and a five-step framework to support policymakers and NOC representatives to navigate these decisions.

NOCs produce more than half of the world’s oil and gas, and in many producing countries their decisions have major implications for public finances, energy policy and long-term development outcomes. That role is only growing in importance in an increasingly uncertain energy future. How NOCs can adapt to that uncertain future remains unresolved, and shocks such as today’s soaring and volatile prices serve as a potent reminder of the need to look ahead and plan for the future.

NRGI’s work on NOCs has evolved alongside these shifts, supporting more informed and inclusive decision-making about natural resources and the energy transition. As we mark our 20^th anniversary in 2026, we are building on this experience with new insights on the future of NOCs.

Our new report National Oil Company Transformation: Strategic Choices for an Uncertain Energy Future is part of that effort. As we prepare to launch this work, we are also taking a moment to reflect on how our thinking around NOCs has evolved through four key phases, and what  this means for the choices that countries face now and hence for the future of NRGI’s NOC work.

1. Building the foundations: from transparency to governance and country-driven change (2006-2017)

NRGI’s early work focused on extractive revenue transparency, helping citizens better understand how extractive revenues flowed into public coffers. NOCs were not initially central to this agenda, but concerns about country-level corruption risks and NOC opacity gradually brought them to the fore, particularly around their role in financial flows. 

Sustained work on NOC oil sales transparency followed and led to tangible impacts. In Nigeria, work by NRGI and partners NEITI led to NNPC canceling criticized contracts. NRGI also produced guidance on state-owned enterprise (SOE) disclosures, supporting global norm strengthening and supporting efforts by organizations such as México Evalúa to assess NOC transparency. 

Over time, we expanded beyond transparency to other core NOC governance questions, asking not just what is disclosed, but how institutions are run. This included delving into NOC reforms such as limiting political interference while ensuring sufficient oversight.

In the early 2010s, we also began engaging more deeply on NOCs in emerging “oil hotspots” such as Ghana, including partnering with Chatham House and the Commonwealth Secretariat to establish the New Petroleum Producers Group. Key to our approach was tailoring methods to different settings, balancing cross-country learning with the reality that not all countries are Norway.

Across these early engagements—from UNOC in Uganda to Pertamina in Indonesia—we started to combine cross-cutting NOC research with country-level engagement, and saw this as useful in achieving impact, including in difficult contexts such as Myanmar.

• Effective NOC governance is critical and multi-faceted. NOC transparency is necessary but not sufficient. It must be paired with other governance improvements, including stronger institutions and oversight.
• Real change is largely country driven. Global tools are most impactful when shaped by and applied through country programming, drawing on deep country knowledge and partnerships.

2. Leveraging a data-driven approach for impact (2017-2020)

The second phase focused on data to drive reform, inform decisions, shape incentives and encourage better performance of NOCs.

The Resource Governance Index (RGI) benchmarked more than 50 NOCs and showed widespread governance gaps. This data-driven approach helped lead to tangible changes. 

In Qatar, engagement with Qatar Petroleum resulted in the company publishing annual and sustainability plans on its website for the first time. In Mexico, NRGI inputs to the National Hydrocarbons Commission (CNH), whose purview included regulation of Pemex, led to CNH pushing Pemex to improve transparency. 

A major milestone in this phase was the launch of NRGI’s National Oil Company Database, the world’s largest open dataset on NOCs. It provides quantitative insights on fiscal transfer patterns and debt-sustainability risks, helping governments, private-sector analysts, journalists and international financial institutions better understand the profound public finance implications of NOC decisions. 

NRGI also used this data-driven approach to support country-level analysis of opportunities and risks surrounding NOC oil sales, including in Ghana, and resource-backed loans, including in Nigeria.

Across these efforts, NRGI used data as a lever: to clarify fiscal stakes, justify accountability asks, and strengthen the connection between evidence and reform.

3. NOCs and the challenges of the energy transition (2021-2025)

In this third phase, the energy transition became central to our NOC work, which in turn helped shape broader understanding of the role NOCs play in shaping the global energy transition. In addition to controlling more than half of global oil and gas production, NOCs control around 40 percent of total sector investment and close to 60 percent of reserves. 

NOCs play a critical role in how producing countries respond to declining long-term demand for fossil fuels. Their investment strategies can either reinforce continued dependence on oil extraction or support a more diversified energy future.

A major NRGI focus during this phase was on the “risky bets” of NOCs in a context of weakening global hydrocarbon demand. Importantly, NRGI framed these risks primarily as a public investment and fiscal management challenge. We highlighted the impact of NOC investment choices on national cash flows, debt sustainability and long-term fiscal space. This framing proved influential in Ghana where supported partners including the  Alliance of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) Working on Extractives, Anti-corruption and Good Governance to help prevent a risky prospective investment by GNPC. 

Recognizing the value of peer benchmarking among NOCs, we assessed how 21 NOCs acknowledge, assess and mitigate transition risks. We complemented this comparative approach with analysis anchored in country challenges, linking transition to fiscal and institutional questions such as Pemex’s debt challenges in Mexico and Ecopetrol’s relationship with Colombia’s government.

During this phase our NOC work also expanded into climate-related areas, including the crucial role of NOCs in methane emissions in Mexico, Nigeria and the MENA region. We contributed to methane abatement finance guidance targeted at NOCs and worked to improve incorporation of NOCs in national climate commitments, including in Mexico. We also worked with partners such as IISD on more effective climate community engagement with NOCs, including at various COPs.

Across countries such as Colombia, Ghana, Mexico, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda, our work responded to a growing demand among various stakeholders to deepen informed national debate on how NOCs navigate the energy transition. 

4. The next phase: NOC transformation 

NRGI’s NOC work is now entering an exciting next phase.

With the launch of our new report, we move beyond assessing risk to examining how governments, NOC leaders and other stakeholders can define credible NOC transformation pathways that manage transition risks while making the most of emerging opportunities. 

The report sets out a framework to help countries:

• Define national-level policy goals, 
• Assess capacities and constraints, including the NOC’s ability to pursue new business opportunities, 
• Align mandates, governance structures and financial resources with the chosen transformation pathway, and
• pursue a just transition, given the important role NOCs play in shaping outcomes for workers and communities in oil producing regions. 

This framework also reflects a key lesson from our in-country experience: there is no single model. What is feasible, and at what pace, will differ across countries and NOCs. Transformation pathways must reflect fiscal realities, political dynamics and institutional capacity.

Looking ahead

NRGI’s NOC work will continue to evolve to meet new challenges.  

We will contribute to discussions on transition roadmaps, where the role of NOCs will be decisive, and to accountability on methane commitments, where NOCs lag significantly behind. 

Our NOC transformation work will expand to better include energy security, the financing of transformation and links to national “green industrial policy” plans. We aim to update the NOC Database to integrate transition indicators, strengthening cross-country benchmarking and national advocacy. 

This also means engaging more with narratives shaping NOC policies and strengthening strategic communications to better support national debate on NOC transformations.

As highlighted during the launch of NRGI’s 20th anniversary earlier this month, the lessons of the past provide a foundation to “confront the challenges that persist, and the new ones that emerge.” This is particularly true for NOCs. As NOCs take on a larger role in an uncertain energy future, the stakes are rising. The challenge is no longer just improving NOC governance, but defining the role of these companies in addressing the most pressing resource governance challenges—from navigating energy transition risks and opportunities to advancing both development and decarbonization. 

NRGI looks forward to continuing this dynamic NOC work with partners to respond to these challenges.

NOCs produce more than half of the world’s oil and gas output, yet they have remained largely absent from climate debates. Unlike international oil companies, they are state-owned actors that shape and are shaped by national policy. In the last COP cycles, however, their presence has grown.

At COP28, 34 NOCs signed the Oil & Gas Decarbonization Charter, pledging to cut operational emissions, end routine flaring and reduce methane intensity to 0.2 percent by 2030. The Charter, however, does not address emissions generated when the oil and gas they produce is burned, and many signatories continue approving new oil and gas projects, patterns inconsistent with the global stocktake’s call to transition away from fossil fuels.

Beyond COPs, climate interest in NOCs is growing. NRGI has received more invitations to speak at climate forums about NOCs and collaborate on the topic. Other organizations are also expanding work in this space, such as EDF on methane measurement and IISD on NOC transition pathways. Yet, despite this momentum, few governments are integrating NOCs into their climate policies.

Most national pledges overlook NOCs

Only ten countries mentioned their NOC in their NDC 2.0 (in any form, including just a passing reference): Azerbaijan, Cameroon, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Oman, Mexico, Qatar, the UAE and Venezuela. In the current wave of NDC 3.0 updates, only five countries have done so to date: Azerbaijan, Angola, Bangladesh, the UAE, and Venezuela.

As state-owned enterprises, NOCs embody the government’s direct influence—and responsibility—over an important source of emissions. For example, in Mexico the energy sector accounts for around 64 percent of national greenhouse gas emissions, and Pemex alone produces about 95 percent of the country’s hydrocarbons.

Countries that have not yet submitted their NDC 3.0 can still integrate them in this round; those that have can incorporate them into implementation frameworks so that climate commitments remain credible.

However, a mention is not a commitment to action. Below are core elements of robust NOC integration into NDCs. To date, only the first category appears in any NDCs.

• Set explicit carbon and methane reduction targets for the NOC.
  • Colombia’s NDC 2.0 mentions that “Ecopetrol committed in 2019 to reduce its emissions by 20% by 2030 in line with the country target defined in 2015.”
  • Qatar’s NDC 2.0 states that “Qatar Petroleum (QP) is committed to zero routine flaring by 2030, with a long-term goal to reduce flaring in onshore facilities to the absolute minimum.”
  • Mexico’s NDC 2.0 notes that “Petróleos Mexicanos has set a methane gas utilization target of 98%, considering the production of existing and new fields.”
  • The UAE’s NDC 3.0 mentions the NOC’s ambition “to achieve net zero by 2045” and “reduce carbon intensity by 25% by 2030,” and a target to “have methane intensity below 0.15% by 2025.”
• Express those targets in absolute terms, with defined baselines and reference years.
• Cover full value chain emissions—including Scope 3 emissions—associated with current, planned and projected operations, with clear milestones for national action on Scope 1 and 2.
• Disclose or estimate the NOC’s share of national emissions.
• Explicitly align NOC strategies and capital spending with national climate targets.
• Establish a framework for tracking NOC-specific emissions and progress.
• Acknowledge exposure to transition risks (economic, fiscal and market impacts from a long-term decline in oil and gas demand).
• Task the NOC with contributing to a just transition such as regional economic diversification, workforce reskilling and responsible infrastructure decommissioning.
• Involve NOC leadership and workers in the NDC drafting process.

Why stronger NOC targets could unlock climate finance

International lenders and climate finance institutions increasingly treat NDCs as investment plans. When NOCs are major emitters, they need NOC-specific targets and disclosures. Without this level of transparency, it is difficult to assess investment needs or align climate finance instruments.

Methane reduction is where climate finance can move fastest. Around 80 percent of oil and gas abatement options are cost-neutral or profitable. NOCs could lead the way. With targeted funding for leak detection, flaring reduction and monitoring, governments could secure rapid, measurable results.

For countries like Mexico or Nigeria, where regulations already exist but enforcement is weak, including these targets in NDCs could strengthen oversight and attract international support for implementation.

Climate planning around NOCs must also address just transition responsibilities

The UNFCCC has emphasized that this next round must include the social and economic plans that make emissions targets viable—and this just transition focus is set to increase at COP30. For countries with NOCs, such plans are impossible without them.

In many low- and middle-income countries, NOCs are major employers and fiscal pillars. NOCs also often safeguard national resources and ensure energy security. Their operations are tied to public services, regional development and politics, making them vital actors and potential obstacles to change. For example, Pemex has resisted methane regulation and enforcement efforts, shifted targets and limited independent oversight.

Global just transition agendas, including the UNFCCC’s Just Transition Work Programme, rarely mention NOCs. Recognizing their role is crucial to building just transition strategies that are socially inclusive and politically viable.

In Mexico, oil-dependent states of Campeche and Tabasco are already feeling the effects of declining production—from shrinking fiscal revenues to job losses. Mexico’s climate policy should incorporate explicit just transition measures linked to Pemex’s operations, focusing on regional economic diversification, workforce reskilling and responsible decommissioning of oil infrastructure.

How can COP30 advance the integration of NOCs in climate action?

Brazil—where Petrobras’s role continues to expose the tensions between climate ambition and fossil expansion—offers a key stage to keep NOCs in focus and advance their integration into national climate policies. This means embedding NOCs into national climate frameworks with measurable targets, transparent reporting and clear roles in just transition strategies.

If the right framing and direction are set, COP30 can help governments, investors and climate advocates to embed NOCs into the architecture of climate governance—ensuring that the actors most central to the fossil economy become equally central to its transformation.

President Claudia Sheinbaum has pledged that Mexico will reach net-zero emissions by 2050. To achieve this, the country’s updated NDC must go beyond technical greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets. It should provide a clear roadmap that links climate action to real improvements in people’s lives, including more stable jobs, stronger communities, and a future-ready economy.

In this context, Pemex must play a central role. The energy sector accounts for 64% of the country’s GHG emissions, and Pemex is responsible for 95% of hydrocarbon production and the bulk of associated infrastructure. In Mexico, to talk about hydrocarbons is essentially to talk about Pemex.

Why Pemex?

International experience shows that state-owned oil companies are still unprepared for the challenges of the energy transition, including declining oil demand. Governments have a decisive role to play. By setting clear policy signals and creating financing mechanisms, they can help these companies shift toward new business models.

The Mexican state holds a particularly strong influence over Pemex, given the company’s heavy reliance on government support. In 2025 and 2026 alone, Pemex faces debt maturities of US$24 billion, while the proposed 2026 budget allocates MXN 263.5 billion for debt servicing. That figure is double the 2025 allocation, equivalent to half of the resources earmarked for senior citizens’ pensions and six times the proposed environmental budget.

A stronger, more decisive commitment from Pemex would send a powerful signal that Mexico is willing to align its state-owned company with its decarbonization and just transition goals. Such a step would not only reinforce national climate ambition but also build confidence among the international community, the financial sector and the public.

Integrating Pemex into Mexico’s NDC 3.0: three priorities

1. Reduce methane emissions

Methane is 25 to 80 times more potent than CO₂ and poses serious health risks to communities living near oil facilities. Between 2012 and 2021, Pemex’s largest emission increases came from this gas.

Between 2021 and 2024, Pemex’s methane emissions fell by 29 percent. The company launched its first sustainability plan and voiced its commitment to the World Bank’s Zero Routine Flaring by 2030 initiative. However, Pemex’s methane output remains higher than a decade ago and above that of its international peers. Cutting these emissions is both urgent and strategic, as proven technological solutions exist and, in many cases, are cost-effective. The updated NDC offers the right framework for Pemex to adopt absolute, phased reduction targets, improve measurement and transparency, and join the Oil & Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP 2.0). Doing so would position Mexico as a global leader in methane mitigation.

2. Manage transition risks

Pemex ranks 11th among 58 state-owned oil companies most exposed to transition risks, according to a recent NRGI analysis. Up to US$10 billion in assets could become uneconomic under the International Energy Agency’s Announced Pledges Scenario, posing major risks for public revenues, jobs, and communities tied to the oil industry.

Mexico's updated NDC should respond by promoting transparent risk assessments, redirecting investments toward lower-carbon, higher-return projects, encouraging business diversification, and fostering joint ventures with the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE). It should also establish stronger corporate governance mechanisms under the Ministry of Energy’s (SENER) oversight to ensure planning is consistent with sustainability goals.

3. Just transition plans for oil-producing regions

States such as Campeche and Tabasco, heavily dependent on oil revenues, are already experiencing the impacts of declining production. To ensure no one is left behind, Mexico’s NDC should include just transition plans and the responsible decommissioning of infrastructure. This roadmap should prioritize economic diversification, workforce retraining, tailored educational programs, and greater transparency on environmental and health impacts.

These measures are in line with the outcomes of Mexico’s Local Conference of Youth proposals (2025 LCOY) and the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources’ (SEMARNAT) agenda for NDC 3.0, can foster a transition that delivers tangible benefits to the communities most dependent on oil.

Pemex at the center of Mexico’s climate action

The NDC gives Mexico a critical chance to raise its climate ambition, demonstrate international leadership, and put Pemex on a sustainable path. Explicitly including the company would send a clear signal of commitment to a just and orderly transition, in step with the global call to move beyond fossil fuels.

For decades, Pemex has been at the center of Mexico’s energy policy. It must now be at the heart of its climate response. This is the moment to show that commitment and accelerate progress toward net-zero emissions by 2050, building a more equitable, transparent future that delivers for all Mexicans.